“I would have given my life to play soccer. This is what I feel the worst about.
Not to ever be able to play again.” Onore Zafra Sanchez is sixteen. He stepped
on a land mine while walking in a rural area of Colombia. He is only one of the
thousands of victims of these infernal explosives that have earned the South American
country the record of dead and wounded: 1,107 in 2006 alone, for an average of
three a day. Of these, 304 are civilians, of whom 66 are children.
A 40 page report of Human Rights Watch titled Mutilating the People: The Use of Land Mines and Other Indiscriminate Arms on
the Part of Guerrillas in Colombia denounces this. In the dock of the accused before all others, the philo-marxist
combatants of FARC, the Revolutionary Armed Forces, followed by the Army of National
Liberation (ELN), a second guerrilla group, and then their forever enemies, the
paramilitary groups on the right who often collude with the government army.
Stories like so many. “I feel incomplete. I have only one hand, the other children have two.” Pablo
is nine years old, and he told Human Rights Watch what he has experienced since
a mine made him disabled. Lucia, instead, is ten, and for the same reason now
is blind and has a single hand that lacks several fingers. Because of the absence
of specialists who could teach her to adapt to this new dark world, full of phantoms,
the little girl has had to leave her village and move to a large city, Bucaramanga,
where she lives in a special place. And hers is a fate that touches many, because
to step on a mine doesn’t provoke only physical damage: it violates the entire
life. The traumas are profound: mental equilibrium is strongly compromised and
the family structure broken.
One for all. These are usually poor people who live in abandoned agricultural areas, often
badly served and far from urban centers: for the survivors nothing is ever the
same. And when the victims are adults, heads of families, the entire family is
overwhelmed by the explosion. “I was a farmer, a cultivator of yucca, corn, plantains,
and cocoa. I was born in a field. I thought I could live there for ever,” explained
Edilberto Prada Ardila, 46 years old, blind in one eye and without both hands
because of a land mine. Now he lives on charity in a big city.
Victims and Executioners. Those responsible for this butchery first and foremost are those who call themselves
The People’s Army, or the FARC. This is a fact that clashes with the ideology
that seems to inspire a guerrilla who says that for more than forty years he has
fought for a new Colombia, to give it to the Colombians. “It’s the weapon of the
poor,” they say as justification. “In war you have to use everything that allows
you to defend yourself,” the commandant of the Magdalene Medio Pastor Alape bloc
has told Peace Reporter. “So we also use mines. We make them ourselves. They are
economical. And it is also true that every so often it happens that some civilian
is wounded. But it’s always a matter of incidents. Certainly it isn’t very ethical,
but the smart bombs of the rich empire of the war make mistakes, a farmer-guerrilla
who must defend himself to survive can make a mistake. And anyway, one can’t generalize.
One must analyze particular examples before judging. We always gather up our unexploded
explosives. Our house is the forest. If every time that we have laid a trap for
an enemy by mining an area we had left unexploded bombs, now we would be in prison.
And then explosives cost; we can’t let ourselves waste them.” The same refrain
in the declarations released by ELN. This justification is also extended to the
explosives obtained from bottled gas and thrown at objectives that are supposed
to be military, but that for lack of precision of the throwers happen to destroy
houses, stables, churches.
So FARC, ELC, and the paramilitaries take a risk. Colombia is a country at war for more than forty years, and international law
categorically prohibits
the use of arms of indiscriminate impact such as land mines. Therefore, the members
and the commandants of the armed groups who intentionally order or direct attacks
against civilians face trials for war crimes, and—if the aggression was part of
a larger systematic attack against a community of civilians (as often happens
with the paramilitaries on the right who tend to clear entire areas, improvising
summary executions of hundreds of civilians, who are then hidden in common ditches)
they risk being accused of crimes against humanity in accordance with the Statute
of Rome of the International Penal Court.
And the government? Colombia is a member nation of the treaty banning land mines of 1997, and it
signed the United Nations convention on the rights of disabled people. Therefore,
it has a series of obligations toward all the victims of mines: medical and economic
assistance, pensions for disability, and an entire series of specific benefits.
Yet, for the majority of the thousands of Colombians disfigured by explosives
all this is only a mirage. Notwithstanding that the South American country receives
copious international aid, includine funds from the European Union earmarked to
aid the wounded and to spread a culture of prevention and support, almost all
of the survivors receive no assistance. Functionaries of local government, doctors
and paramedics, and the very survivors of explosions continue to know nothing
or almost nothing of their rights and the benefits that await them. Moreover,
access to these benefits are made still more difficult by the too brief deadlines
by which to present the complex documentation foreseen by the law. Everything
is lost in bureaucratic labyrinths. And, even in the rare cases in which a wounded
person succeeds in getting the money that is coming to him, it’s a question of
an amount that is insufficient to guarantee a dignified life. In fact, Human Rights
Watch closes its report with an appeal to the government to review and reform
its programs of assistance, canceling serious deficiencies that worsen a situation
that is already too dramatic.
Stella Spinelli